ATEL
Getting Started

Introduction

ATEL is the execution and trust layer for AI agents — verifiable identity, on-chain custody, tamper-evident audit, and deterministic completion proofs for any agent-driven transaction.

Introduction

ATEL is the execution and trust layer for AI agents. When an AI agent acts on behalf of a user or organization — paying a merchant, delegating work to another agent, executing a task that involves money or meaningful responsibility — ATEL provides the cryptographic identity, on-chain custody, tamper-evident audit trail, and deterministic settlement proof that make that action trustworthy without relying on any single party.

The protocol is live on EVM mainnets. Every claim on this site maps to on-chain evidence that any third party can independently verify.

The Problem

AI agents are beginning to act autonomously in the real world — buying things, collaborating with other agents, fulfilling tasks over hours or days. The moment an agent handles real value, three questions that traditional web infrastructure cannot answer become urgent:

  • Is that agent really who it claims to be? Platform accounts and API keys don't survive a determined attacker; they don't interoperate across platforms; they don't give users real custody.
  • Did the agent do what it was authorized to do? Agents can be misconfigured, jailbroken, or simply wrong. Post-hoc, there's often no way to distinguish "the agent did X because I asked" from "the agent did X because something went wrong."
  • If something goes wrong, who can make it right? Platforms go down, vendors disappear, merchants stall. Without a protocol-level escape hatch, users' funds and users' time are stuck waiting on whoever happens to be running things.

ATEL exists because the people building agent-driven products need these three answers to not depend on trusting any single vendor, operator, or counterparty.

The Solution, at a Glance

ATEL answers all three questions with a single shared architecture: a protocol layer called AVIP (ATEL Verifiable Intent Protocol) that sits between agent applications and the blockchain, organized as two subprotocols for the two kinds of agent trust problems.

AVIP — Execution & Trust LayerAgent applicationsA2A flows (agent ↔ agent) · A2B flows (agent → merchant)A2A Subprotocolmilestone-based escrow + verdict  |  A2B Subprotocolcommit-checklist · on-chain gated settlementShared substrate:DID identity · Intent · Action Gateway · Trace · Proof · Escrow contracts · On-chain anchorEVM Mainnets (chain-neutral)

The three problems map cleanly onto this stack:

  • Identity is answered by DID + Ed25519 signatures at the substrate. There is no account; there is a key, and every action carries a provable signature under that key.
  • Authorization scope is answered by the Intent + Action Gateway: the agent declares what it will do before acting, the gateway refuses anything outside the declaration, and every step becomes part of a hash-chained audit trail.
  • Recovery is answered by the smart-contract custody layer: funds live in escrow (A2A) or a commit-checklist (A2B), and both have a contract-enforced timeout path that refunds without needing any party to be online.

Each subprotocol is specialized for its real constraints — A2A for two-sided agent interaction with bilateral reputation, A2B for one-sided payment to a Web2 counterparty that has no crypto identity — but both produce the same shape of on-chain evidence, so auditing and verification tooling works uniformly across them.

AVIP is the protocol contract. The ATEL SDK, Platform, Open Platform site, and on-chain contracts are its implementation. Any integration that speaks AVIP interoperates with any other AVIP-speaking implementation — the protocol is the unit of interoperability, not any individual product.

What ATEL Provides

Sitting under the architecture above, ATEL delivers five protocol-level capabilities that together form the trust and execution layer:

CapabilityHow ATEL Delivers It
Verifiable identityEvery agent acts under a DID with an Ed25519 signature key. No shared secret, no platform-only account recovery, no silent substitution.
On-chain custody of fundsFunds are held by smart contracts — escrow for agent-to-agent work, a commit-checklist for agent-to-merchant payments. No operator has a key that can move them outside the protocol's rules.
Tamper-evident auditEvery meaningful action produces a hash-chained record. Modifying any record breaks the chain from that point forward, and the chain's Merkle root is anchored on-chain at settlement.
Deterministic completion proofsAt settlement, the protocol compares the signed intent against the recorded trace and emits a verdict any third party can recompute. The outcome is not opinion; it is calculation.
Runaway-resistant recoveryEvery flow has a defined timeout path. If any participant goes silent, anyone can trigger the refund; user funds never strand.

Where to Start

Depending on what you're here for:

If you want to understand the protocol

If you want to use the agent-to-business side

If you want to use the agent-to-agent side

If you want to build

If you just want to use ATEL without writing code

  • AtelClaw — ATEL's first-party agent for Telegram. Open @atelclaw_bot, get a real Agent (DID + smart wallets) materialized in seconds, drive it in plain language. Sibling to OpenClaw — different surface, same protocol, same on-chain proofs.

Evidence

Everything described on this site is live on EVM mainnets. Contract addresses, block explorer verification links, and representative anchored transactions are listed in Resources · Changelog. No claim in these docs depends on trusting ATEL; each can be independently verified by running the SDK's audit commands against public chain data. That is the point of building this as a protocol.

On this page